BBakken SubsurfaceNorth Dakota well index

Spacing unit · McKenzie County

1,280-acre Bakken spacing unit

T153N R93W sections 29, 32

Spacing unit4 wells allowed · order 32623Elm Tree-Bakken

Unit facts

Formation
Bakken
Acres
1,280
Type
Spacing unit
Land described
T153N R93W sections 29, 32
Pool
Elm Tree-Bakken
Zone
Zone VIII
County
McKenzie County
Surveyed wells inside
9
Most wells operated by
Continental Resources
Unit id
dsu-7045d18afa149d8987ce
Wells allowed by the latest linked order
4
Wells assigned to this unit
9
Pending permits inside
0
Balance under the allowance
-5
First linked order
May 7, 2009
Review note
later_order_likely_missing
Laterals that still fit (Nov 2026 method)
2 (1.91 two-mile equivalents)
Neighbourhood target density
11.04 two-mile laterals per 1,280 acres
Density drilled so far
8.65 per 1,280 acres

Room to drill: 2 laterals still fit at the density this unit's neighbourhood has reached (the larger of the 75th percentile of mature units within 10 miles and the median of units drilled in the last three years), placed in the widest gaps with the setbacks of the November 2026 method. Machine-made and geometric: not a commitment to drill, not a permit, order, lease or plan, and no economics. Land is counted once, so a unit under a larger unit shows only what the larger one left. How it is computed.

Map

Harms West Federal 7-32H1Harms West Federal 3-32HSL1Harms West Federal 5-32H2Harms West Federal 4-32HHarms West Federal 8-32HHarms West Federal 9-32H2Harms West Federal 6-32HHARMS 1-32HHARMS 2-32H1 mi

DMR footprint (NAD83) with the published surface locations of its wells. Laterals run under the unit; pads often sit on a neighbouring section.

Open in the regional 3D viewerFootprint, wells and production playbackSee on the cases and orders mapHistorical spacing units by order

Wells inside the unit

WellOperatorStatusLateral inside
Harms West Federal 7-32H1CONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC.Active (A)11,362 ft100%
Harms West Federal 3-32HSL1CONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC.Active (A)10,199 ft100%
Harms West Federal 5-32H2CONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC.Active (A)10,186 ft100%
Harms West Federal 4-32HCONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC.Active (A)10,185 ft100%
Harms West Federal 8-32HCONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC.Active (A)10,182 ft100%
Harms West Federal 9-32H2CONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC.Active (A)10,155 ft100%
Harms West Federal 6-32HCONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC.Active (A)9,958 ft100%
HARMS 1-32HCONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC.Active (A)9,536 ft100%
HARMS 2-32HCONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC.Active (A)9,414 ft100%

Surveyed Bakken-system laterals with at least 660 ft of plan-view length inside the published footprint. Geometric membership, not a legal assignment; a lateral can cross several units.

Order history

  1. Order 13106Case 11065Established the spacing unitCONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC.
  2. Order 13389Case 11292Designated the spacing unitCONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC.
  3. Order 16517Case 14242Designated the spacing unitHESS CORP.
  4. Order 16633Case 14356Designated the spacing unit, 4 wells allowedCONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC.
  5. Order 18737Case 16471Established the spacing unit, 4 wells allowedCONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC.
  6. Order 21246Case 18945Designated the spacing unit, 4 wells allowedCONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC.
  7. Order 21151Case 18850Established the spacing unit, 2 wells allowedCONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC.
  8. Order 21774Case 19472Designated the spacing unit, 2 wells allowedHESS CORP.
  9. Order 22444Case 20138Pooled all interests in the unitCONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC.
  10. Order 31278Case 28666Designated the spacing unit, 11 wells allowedPETRO- HUNT, LLC
  11. Order 31293Case 28747Designated the spacing unit, 7 wells allowedCONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC.
  12. Order 31304Case 28758Established the spacing unit, 11 wells allowedCONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC.
  13. Order 32623Case 30014Designated the spacing unit, 4 wells allowedCONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC.

Facts extracted from signed NDIC orders whose land description covers this footprint; machine-extracted and not human-reviewed. A stated allowance is what that order allowed, not proof that it governs today.

Overlapping units

2 other units share a surveyed well with this one; overlapping units are not additive.