BBakken SubsurfaceNorth Dakota well index

Spacing unit · Williams County

1,280-acre Bakken spacing unit

T158N R97W sections 14, 23

Spacing unit6 wells allowed · order 35150New Home-Bakken

Unit facts

Formation
Bakken
Acres
1,280
Type
Spacing unit
Land described
T158N R97W sections 14, 23
Pool
New Home-Bakken
Zone
Zone II
County
Williams County
Surveyed wells inside
1
Most wells operated by
Hess / Chevron
Unit id
dsu-83e502837ff882ee053f
Wells allowed by the latest linked order
6
Wells assigned to this unit
1
Pending permits inside
0
Balance under the allowance
+5
First linked order
Jun 11, 2012
Laterals that still fit (Nov 2026 method)
5 (4.75 two-mile equivalents)
Neighbourhood target density
5.39 two-mile laterals per 1,280 acres
Density drilled so far
0.97 per 1,280 acres

Room to drill: 5 laterals still fit at the density this unit's neighbourhood has reached (the larger of the 75th percentile of mature units within 10 miles and the median of units drilled in the last three years), placed in the widest gaps with the setbacks of the November 2026 method. Machine-made and geometric: not a commitment to drill, not a permit, order, lease or plan, and no economics. Land is counted once, so a unit under a larger unit shows only what the larger one left. How it is computed.

Map

GN-DALSENG- 158-97-1423H-11 mi

DMR footprint (NAD83) with the published surface locations of its wells. Laterals run under the unit; pads often sit on a neighbouring section.

Wells inside the unit

WellOperatorStatusLateral inside
GN-DALSENG- 158-97-1423H-1HESS BAKKEN INVESTMENTS II, LLCActive (A)10,270 ft100%

Surveyed Bakken-system laterals with at least 660 ft of plan-view length inside the published footprint. Geometric membership, not a legal assignment; a lateral can cross several units.

Order history

  1. Order 17908Case 15653Established the spacing unit, 6 wells allowed
  2. Order 22930Case 20625Pooled all interests in the unitHESS CORP.

Facts extracted from signed NDIC orders whose land description covers this footprint; machine-extracted and not human-reviewed. A stated allowance is what that order allowed, not proof that it governs today.