BBakken SubsurfaceNorth Dakota well index

Spacing unit · North Dakota

1,280-acre Bakken spacing unit

T146N R99W sections 5, 8

Spacing unit4 wells allowed · order 21839Butte-Bakken

Unit facts

Formation
Bakken
Acres
1,280
Type
Spacing unit
Land described
T146N R99W sections 5, 8
Pool
Butte-Bakken
Surveyed wells inside
0
Most wells operated by
GMX RESOURCES INC.
Unit id
dsu-ada03fe1cf8736dd7ac4
Wells allowed by the latest linked order
4
Wells assigned to this unit
0
Pending permits inside
0
Balance under the allowance
+4
First linked order
Jul 26, 2010
Laterals that still fit (Nov 2026 method)
9 (8.67 two-mile equivalents)
Neighbourhood target density
8.24 two-mile laterals per 1,280 acres
Density drilled so far
0 per 1,280 acres

Room to drill: 9 laterals still fit at the density this unit's neighbourhood has reached (the larger of the 75th percentile of mature units within 10 miles and the median of units drilled in the last three years), placed in the widest gaps with the setbacks of the November 2026 method. Machine-made and geometric: not a commitment to drill, not a permit, order, lease or plan, and no economics. Land is counted once, so a unit under a larger unit shows only what the larger one left. How it is computed.

Map

1 mi

DMR footprint (NAD83) with the published surface locations of its wells. Laterals run under the unit; pads often sit on a neighbouring section.

Wells inside the unit

No surveyed lateral has 660 ft or more inside this footprint.

Order history

  1. Order 14785Case 12528Established the spacing unit, 1 well allowedCONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC.
  2. Order 18228Case 15966Established the spacing unit, 1 well allowedGMX RESOURCES INC.
  3. Order 18228Case 15966Designated the spacing unitGMX RESOURCES INC.
  4. Order 21840Case 19538Pooled all interests in the unitGMX RESOURCES INC.
  5. Order 21839Case 19537Established the spacing unit, 4 wells allowedGMX RESOURCES INC.
  6. Order 25930Case 23144Designated the spacing unit

Facts extracted from signed NDIC orders whose land description covers this footprint; machine-extracted and not human-reviewed. A stated allowance is what that order allowed, not proof that it governs today.