BBakken SubsurfaceNorth Dakota well index

Spacing unit · North Dakota

1,920-acre Bakken spacing unit

T147N R99W sections 20, 29, 32

Spacing unit4 wells allowed · order 34734Bennett Creek-Bakken

Unit facts

Formation
Bakken
Acres
1,920
Type
Spacing unit
Land described
T147N R99W sections 20, 29, 32
Pool
Bennett Creek-Bakken
Zone
Zone IV
Surveyed wells inside
0
Most wells operated by
Burlington / Marathon
Unit id
dsu-ae160c3404490066362d
Wells allowed by the latest linked order
4
Wells assigned to this unit
0
Pending permits inside
4
Balance under the allowance
+4
First linked order
Mar 21, 2013
Laterals that still fit (Nov 2026 method)
5 (7.23 two-mile equivalents)
Neighbourhood target density
4.84 two-mile laterals per 1,280 acres
Density drilled so far
0 per 1,280 acres

Room to drill: 5 laterals still fit at the density this unit's neighbourhood has reached (the larger of the 75th percentile of mature units within 10 miles and the median of units drilled in the last three years), placed in the widest gaps with the setbacks of the November 2026 method. Machine-made and geometric: not a commitment to drill, not a permit, order, lease or plan, and no economics. Land is counted once, so a unit under a larger unit shows only what the larger one left. How it is computed.

Map

1 mi

DMR footprint (NAD83) with the published surface locations of its wells. Laterals run under the unit; pads often sit on a neighbouring section.

Wells inside the unit

No surveyed lateral has 660 ft or more inside this footprint.

Order history

  1. Order 21274Case 18973Designated the spacing unitGMX RESOURCES INC.
  2. Order 21812Case 19510Established the spacing unitGMX RESOURCES INC.
  3. Order 21841Case 19539Pooled all interests in the unitGMX RESOURCES INC.
  4. Order 34733Case 31980Listed the unit in a pool zone table, 4 wells allowedBURLINGTON RESOURCES OIL & GAS CO. LP
  5. Order 34735Case 31982Designated the spacing unitBURLINGTON RESOURCES OIL & GAS CO. LP

Facts extracted from signed NDIC orders whose land description covers this footprint; machine-extracted and not human-reviewed. A stated allowance is what that order allowed, not proof that it governs today.