BBakken SubsurfaceNorth Dakota well index

Spacing unit · Mountrail County

960-acre Bakken spacing unit

T156N R91W sections 4, 5

Spacing unitRoss-Bakken

Unit facts

Formation
Bakken
Acres
960
Type
Spacing unit
Land described
T156N R91W sections 4, 5
Pool
Ross-Bakken
Zone
Zone V
County
Mountrail County
Surveyed wells inside
1
Most wells operated by
HESS BAKKEN INVESTMENTS II, LLC
Unit id
dsu-e1c111dad603edc6163a
Laterals that still fit (Nov 2026 method)
1 (0.66 two-mile equivalents)
Neighbourhood target density
5.76 two-mile laterals per 1,280 acres
Density drilled so far
0.78 per 1,280 acres

Room to drill: 1 lateral still fit at the density this unit's neighbourhood has reached (the larger of the 75th percentile of mature units within 10 miles and the median of units drilled in the last three years), placed in the widest gaps with the setbacks of the November 2026 method. 4 more would fit the density but not the spacing rule. Machine-made and geometric: not a commitment to drill, not a permit, order, lease or plan, and no economics. Land is counted once, so a unit under a larger unit shows only what the larger one left. How it is computed.

Map

RS-STRAY-156-91- 0405H-11 mi

DMR footprint (NAD83) with the published surface locations of its wells. Laterals run under the unit; pads often sit on a neighbouring section.

Wells inside the unit

WellOperatorStatusLateral inside
RS-STRAY-156-91- 0405H-1HESS BAKKEN INVESTMENTS II, LLCActive (A)6,963 ft100%

Surveyed Bakken-system laterals with at least 660 ft of plan-view length inside the published footprint. Geometric membership, not a legal assignment; a lateral can cross several units.

Order history

  1. Order 11621Case 9872Designated the spacing unit
  2. Order 12975Case 10959Pooled all interests in the unitHESS CORP.
  3. Order 35556Case 32699Designated the spacing unitEOG RESOURCES, INC.

Facts extracted from signed NDIC orders whose land description covers this footprint; machine-extracted and not human-reviewed. A stated allowance is what that order allowed, not proof that it governs today.

Overlapping units

3 other units share a surveyed well with this one; overlapping units are not additive.